• hawksworx
  • blog
  • speaking
  • about
  • search

Search all notes

Of the 23863 notes, 169 contained "render"

A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 5th 2023

My wife keeps sending me random pictures of our cat rendered as a cuddly toy and I’m here for it.

  • Permalink
  • |
  • Mastodon
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 5th 2022

It's been fun adding the archive of my tweets to my own site.

https://www.hawksworx.com/notes/

- Index of all tweets paginated into ~1000 pre-gen pages
- ODB (on-demand) render + cache of any specific tweet page
- Speedy (but basic for now) searching with Edge Functions

  • Permalink
  • |
  • Mastodon
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 14th 2022 replying to this from @RenderATL
@RenderATL @jina This image is badass.
And @jina is badass.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 28th 2022 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@Igloczek @remotesynth @stefanjudis @timbenniks SSR is more slippery because it's not a very definitive term.

It might be in an active server (not Jamstack) or it might be delivered via an Edge Function instead (Jamstack?!)

I think of SSR as at "runtime rendering not on the client", but my campaign for RRNOTC has gone badly
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 22nd 2022 replying to this from @jlengstorf
@jlengstorf A leading enterprise CMS was unable to present content in the components needed, so instead it rendered all possible content into the HTML as JSON and then re-rendered everything needed for that page client-side with JavaScript.

The SEO, A11y, and perf impacts were comical
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 22nd 2022 replying to this from @jlengstorf
@jlengstorf 10 months of engineering work to hit ambitious browser performance goals for a heavy design undone on launch day thanks to the customer adding 8 different analytics tracking products 7 of which were render blocking.

And Google Tag Manger.

#enterprise
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 6th 2021
RT @IleshMistry: The #Jamstack #MMT_TechMeetup had @philhawksworth talking about "Rendering models that scale. Whatever your framework"

Se…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 19th 2021 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@andyhawkes @Netlify @eleven_ty …and if you wanted to mint a unique shareable URL for every recipe permutation, you could do that on demand rather than at build time with Eleventy’s serverless rendering (which is just a helper for Netlify’s on-demand builders)

https://www.11ty.dev/docs/plugins/serverless/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 18th 2021
This should be fun!

I’ll talk about how I migrated an existing site with thousands of pages to use Distributed Persistent Rendering.

There will be lollies. 🍭 https://twitter.com/IleshMistry/status/1461121959643815941
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 11th 2021
Oooh!

https://www.learnwithjason.dev/distributed-persistent-rendering
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 4th 2021 replying to this from @mattyfromle
@mattyfromle @amacarthur @Netlify This looks likes the view of the HTML in dev tools right? So it's the shape of the DOM once the client side JS has done its thing (and looks good). Are you pre-rendering the site into HTML or do you have an HTML only version of this form somewhere in your build?
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 4th 2021 replying to this from @mattyfromle
@mattyfromle @Netlify The way that Netlify creates the endpoint that forms can then post to, is by looking for form elements in the html during the build. So if the form is rendered client-side only, then it won't get detected. Seen this?

https://docs.netlify.com/forms/setup/#work-with-javascript-rendered-forms
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 14th 2021 replying to this from @swyx
@swyx @Netlify :) The Vlolly idea was a bit different. It used a serverless function to do a render if a view was missing, and also did incremental builds thanks to the build cache.

DPR is a far simpler model which adds to a deploy’s assets in the CDN over time as views are first requested. ✨
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 17th 2020 replying to this from @flarup
@flarup What horribly entitled claptrap!

I can't enjoy a game when it feels like my success depends on surrendering to endless in-app micropayments. I'm hungry for games that are free to try, and then have a price tag I can see and pay. That has value to me.

Congrats on a great launch!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 15th 2020
Nextperimenting with all of the rendering spectrum.

https://css-tricks.com/netlify-next-js/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 2nd 2020 replying to this from @FredKSchott
@FredKSchott @blue2blond @slightlylate @eleven_ty As long as it sounds delicious, I’m in!

(And you don’t need to use each of J, A, and M for something to be Jamstack. It’s mostly about the pre-rendering.)

But I’m swayed by “ham”.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 16th 2020 replying to this from @jlengstorf
@jlengstorf @SalientKnight @cassidoo @levlinds FWIW this is the exact usecase I had in this example which is framework agnostic. 404s are handled by a servlerless function which attempts to render content on demand.

https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 8th 2020 replying to this from @sebastienlorber
@sebastienlorber @zachleat @slightlylate @kylemathews @youyuxi @swyx @sarah_edo @Rich_Harris @eleven_ty I think we can clearly distinguish between the modes/models... but the way one uses the tools can also have an influence. That's why I mentioned their "default".

1. Pre-rendered.
2. Client-side rendered.
3. Hybrid. (Pre-rendered with progressively enhanced client-side rendering)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 8th 2020 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@sebastienlorber @zachleat @slightlylate @kylemathews @youyuxi @swyx @sarah_edo @Rich_Harris I typically use @eleven_ty to pre-generate all of my views and serve them as HTML. But I could add some JS to that to progressively enhance and fetch JSON of subsequent pages, rendering them with client-side JS.

Many tools can be used for either model of we choose.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 8th 2020 replying to this from @sebastienlorber
@sebastienlorber @zachleat @slightlylate @kylemathews @youyuxi @swyx @sarah_edo @Rich_Harris If a view of the content is generated in the browser with javascript, I consider that a client-side render.

Gatsby absolutely does client-side rendering. That rendering can happen as an enhancement for subsequent pages after the entry point is delivered as pre-rendered HTML.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 8th 2020 replying to this from @sebastienlorber
@sebastienlorber @zachleat @slightlylate @kylemathews @youyuxi @swyx @sarah_edo @Rich_Harris The tricky thing is that although these have different defaults, all these tools can be used in builds to employ each model (with additional JS for some).

I think of the 2 models as pre-rendered/ready-rendered and client-side rendered.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 23rd 2020
RT @Netlify: Static First: Pre-Generated JAMstack Sites with Serverless Rendering as a Fallback

This post by @philhawksworth on @css is ex…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 22nd 2020 replying to this from @aral
@aral Nice!

One small clarification about #Jamstack though... you don't need to use 3rd party APIs (or even 1st party APIs, or JavaScript) for a site to be Jamstack. Mostly, it is about pre-rendering so a site can be served directly from a CDN, and decoupling APIs if you have them.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 21st 2020 replying to this from @yoavweiss
@yoavweiss @DasSurma Will likely to some sort of follow up post in a while perhaps with some results as well as some more background.

What dynamic assets do you mean? Netlify does the compression of the build assets en route to the CDN where they are then cached. We serve things pre-rendered for 🏎
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 30th 2020 replying to this from @polarbirke
@polarbirke @hankchizljaw @eleven_ty @Netlify Ha! It's a tough competition where we all win because the web gets faster.

(And also, these are build times for the entire 1200 page site, not client-side page render times. The build does the work, so your browser won't have to)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 30th 2020 replying to this from @piccalilli_
@hankchizljaw @eleven_ty @Netlify I should upgrade @eleven_ty from v0.8.3 to v0.10 to see if it gets any sort of site generation speed bump. (Although I'm happy with this, and new pages are available instantly due to the serverless rendering as a fallback)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 30th 2020
Happy to see this little demo still chugging away making lollipops for people.

🍭 https://vlolly.net

@eleven_ty takes ~ 6.5 seconds to generate almost 1200 pages.

@Netlify takes ~ 51 seconds to build and deploy the site and the serverless API

? 👉 https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 26th 2020
"Rendering" - what's that?

There are various terms which convey how we generate HTML or manipulate the DOM. And they can be confusing.

I spent a couple of minutes of this @freeCodeCamp video on JAMstack to describe some popular terms for rendering.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_l0qrPUJds&feature=youtu.be&t=2496
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 11th 2020 replying to this from @r_nd_lph
@_rndlph @smashingmag I think I'd challenge the view that it is rarely acceptable.

The majority of sites on the web don't need their views re-rendered on the fly for every request. Or need a database. Think of how many WordPress blogs exist that hit a database for every view, but change infrequently.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 2nd 2020 replying to this from @joeflateau
@joeflateau @sarah_edo Yeah, I think Id say so!

You serve your views pre-rendered, populating those at build time. And then use some craft serverless fu to service requests for missing assets directly from the source while you back-fill. Right?

One could argue that serverless isn't JAMstack...
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 2nd 2020 replying to this from @joeflateau
@joeflateau @sarah_edo Sounds like that starts to blur the edges 😀

I myself have used a lambda to render routes _as a fallback_ while those new routes were being generated. Then they get served from the CDN.

I think of any server-side request-time render as not jammy. But can be a great complement
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 2nd 2020 replying to this from @joeflateau
@joeflateau @sarah_edo I think of pre-rendered pages as part of what jamstack is. Jamstack enjoys the benefits of pre-rendering as much as possible (in some cases 100% so... yes) and then being able to serve directly from a CDN. Then if needed, using JS to enhance pages with APIs (browser/content/etc)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 28th 2020
RT @NaveenS16: #JAMstack is an emerging term which describes an approach to architecting and delivering sites as pre-rendered assets, and w…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 10th 2020 replying to this from @rposbo
@rposbo @stubbornella @LorienMCS Logically they do seem similar. But in practice and when deploying code and content changes they have quite different implications. If pre-rendering, deployment can be sending everything to the CDN. That’s not the case with SSR if code/data/content might all change independently.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 10th 2020 replying to this from @stubbornella
@stubbornella @LorienMCS My experience has been: this is can be tough to get right.
Server side rendering at request time tends to involve querying dynamic sources (or else why do it on demand per request?)

So you need to define the logic of what is dynamic and what is cacheable throughout the stack.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 7th 2020 replying to this from @chrisbiscardi
@chrisbiscardi @adactio I think this gets more complicated than JS on or off. I've had "just html" go unresponsive on some devices after it was rendered because my device was blocked while it unpacked, parsed and executed a big JS bundle.

Less so on my >$1000 phone and 4G or with JS disabled.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 23rd 2020 replying to this from @anna_debenham
@anna_debenham @Cennydd The two hour delay between purchase and surrender is the mark of true love. I salute you.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 20th 2020
RT @WIRED: Welcome to the upside-down. Or, rather, just what a photographer can do with a drone, 3-D rendering, and Photoshop. Here's how:…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 13th 2020 replying to this from @infinitelychriz
@infinitelychriz @poozipotti @algolia @reactjs You'd probably pre-render at least an app shell, right? And potentially even pre-render the data sources/pages which get requested via js. In which case, sure :)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 13th 2020 replying to this from @poozipotti
@poozipotti @algolia @reactjs Good luck with it! Yes, it is rather a broad term. My rule of thumb is something like:

"Will I have to maintain a web server to host this?"

Since a key part of #JAMstack is being able to host it without the need for a logical server.

Recent thoughts: https://dev.to/philhawksworth/prerendering-is-the-key-to-a-tasty-jamstack-22pp
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 13th 2020 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@poozipotti 2 examples at opposite ends of the JAM spectrum:

http://www.netlify.com is a marketing site & blog which is all pre-rendered (then enhanced with JS to @algolia API for search)

http://app.netlify.com is a @reactjs app, served statically. With lots of client-side APIs for data.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 9th 2020
RT @Netlify: More ways to JAMify your Angular app: Angular Universal 9.0 RC pre-render builder which spins up multiple workers to pre-rende…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 8th 2020 replying to this from @benedfit
@benedfit @shortdiv Yeah good question. I think it will depend to some extent on the size of the build vs the number of visitors. As soon as a site gets any real level of traffic, I’d expect pre-rendering to be favourable in regards to energy.

Measurements are tricky. But I’m very curious too.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 6th 2020
January seems like a good time to share our thoughts and experiments using #JAMstack.

@shortdiv has been blogging **every day this year** about it.

Now, I've added some #jamuary thoughts of my own.

https://dev.to/philhawksworth/prerendering-is-the-key-to-a-tasty-jamstack-22pp
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 25th 2019 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@gumnos @chriscoyier A JAMstack site might seem reliant
On doing everything in the client
In fact though, it depends on what
Requirements and use-cases you have got
The biggest key though, to remember
Is to serve things statically, and pre-render.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 5th 2019
A bit nervous that The Eye Of Sauron is here at @dotJS to watch my talk about #JAMstack and #serverless.

I hope he likes examples of events, automation, pre-rendering, and lollipops. Otherwise he might be a feisty audience member.
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 3rd 2019
If you are generating sites with many thousands of pages, you may already know that @goHuguo has incredibly fast pre-rendering speeds.

Here, @regisphilibert describes some crafty additional optimisations to speed things up even more by caching partials.

https://regisphilibert.com/blog/2019/12/hugo-partial-series-part-1-caching-with-partialcached/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 27th 2019 replying to this from @klarstrup
@klarstrup @swyx Yeah, I like that combo.

- Generate a view and URL of every page.
- Progressively enhance with client-side rendering and APIs for content.

In some cases that will be perfect. In others that will be over engineering. In others still, it might not be practical. But I like it.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 26th 2019 replying to this from @swyx
@swyx Might also be worth considering some drawbacks:

- robustness principal (If we make js a rendering dependency)
- performance (for first load)
- reach (particularly for underpowered mobile devices)
- SEO (if content not in html)

I’m a fan of both.
I tend to say “it depends”
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 19th 2019 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@RapidOwl But if it is all pre-rendered, then you could serve it from anywhere. Including entirely from a CDN with no origin server involved at request time. That's what makes JAMstack sites so massively resilient and scalable.

And you can use PE in the client with APIs to enrich further.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 19th 2019 replying to this from @RapidOwl
@RapidOwl Almost. But a tiny misunderstanding here.

A key attribute is what happens at request time.
If you need to execute logic on a server at request time, like generating a view from a data and a template, then your site isn't "pre-rendered". That's the main distinction.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 15th 2019 replying to this from @piccalilli_
@hankchizljaw @css @eleven_ty @Netlify Just checking... you didn't mean this site, right? (For that 35s.)

This site should return any lolly page instantly because it was pre-generated. Or instantly because it wasn't ready yet, but got served directly from the db thanks to a severless render.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 15th 2019
Since posting this little example of user generated content in a #JAMstack site with #serverless fallbacks on @css, over 800 people have "made lollypop pages" 🍭

Some build stats:
- 800+ pages built by @eleven_ty: ~5.2s
- Full @Netlify deploy: ~30s

https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 14th 2019
Excited to return to this great #JAMstack meet-up in Toronto. I’ll be showing:

- pregeneration
- database as a service
- automation
- user generated content
- serverless rendering
- lollipops

And I’ll have a few copies of the JAMstack book to give away (https://findthat.at/jamstack-book) https://twitter.com/HenriHelvetica/status/1194987955141726208
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 11th 2019
RT @JavaScriptCon: In this keynote by @philhawksworth you’ll explore how an #application can be built to include pre-rendered #userinterfac…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 1st 2019
RT @chriscoyier: JAMstack-spirited pre-rendering pages makes sense for a blog, where there might be <1000 pages, but what about a site with…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 25th 2019 replying to this from @thatsmyjamstack
@thatsmyjamstack @Netlify We talked a bit about using #serverless functions as a fallback to render pages on the fly in place of a 404.

A more detailed description of that and an example which uses this for user generated content on a pre-generated JAMstack site is over here 👇

https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 24th 2019
People of @JSCampRo, thanks ever so much for listening to me talk about #JAMstack and serverless rendering.

More details about my proof of concept published on @css here:
http://findthat.at/lollytricks

And slides are available now
https://findthat.at/servered
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 24th 2019 replying to this from @chadtomkiss
@chadtomkiss @sebdedeyne @fauna I used it a little (and really enjoyed it) on this example site:
https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/

The API is nice.

And we recently launched an official @fauna add-on for @Netlify too, which makes the onramp even more straightforward.

https://www.netlify.com/blog/2019/09/10/announcing-the-faunadb-add-on-for-netlify/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019 replying to this from @_oliverjam
@_oliverjam A serverless server-rendered fallback, no less.
Quite the mouthful.

(and thanks!)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019 replying to this from @
@K16EInc @lauragift21 @css No. This is not about that. There is no client-side js required to render these pages.

This is about making sure that a view is returned for requests to a URL even if that page has not yet finished being created by a static site generator. Serverless functions as a fallback.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019 replying to this from @joaocarmona
@joaocarmona @swyx Yeah, it's similar. But subtly different.

Serverless Pre-Rendering is using functions to populate the CDN with the pages either after every request, or at a configured interval.

My example assumes everything comes from the build. Only hitting a function if something 404s.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019 replying to this from @swyx
@swyx @_Ezell_ @fauna That's right. The scenario is:
Fulfil that URL immediately. And then make pre-render it and enhance it more later if needed (but then not in a time-critical context)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019
I made *a thing* so that I could play with using #serverless functions to render pages on the fly while a site deployment completes.

You can play with it here: https://vlolly.net
And you can read all about it on @css

https://css-tricks.com/static-first-pre-generated-jamstack-sites-with-serverless-rendering-as-a-fallback/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 23rd 2019 replying to this from @zachleat
@zachleat @DasSurma @jeromecoupe @eleven_ty I use pagination for this on my blog. I want some pages to get rendered as a page, and also to get another representation with a simpler template so that I can use that to make images for OG and social. ( “I add “card” to its frontmatter if I want one)

https://github.com/philhawksworth/hawksworx.com/blob/master/src/site/social-cards.njk
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 29th 2019
Tonight should be fun at @MiddlesbroughFE!

If you are planning on coming along, heads up that there has been a venue change. See you there for talk of:

- #JAMstack
- #Serverless rendering
- @Netlify
- Lollipops https://twitter.com/jamiebradley234/status/1167050514489577472
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 13th 2019
Looking forward to speaking at @JavaScriptCon! In this talk, I'll walk through an example of building an example #JAMstack site which:

- Pre-renders all pages as good ol' HTML
- Has #serverless fallbacks for new content
- Automatically regenerates
- Has customisable lollipops 🥳 https://twitter.com/JavaScriptCon/status/1161170659873103872
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 13th 2019
RT @JavaScriptCon: In this Keynote at #IJScon @philhawksworth will show you how an #application can be built to include pre-rendered #useri…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 2nd 2019 replying to this from @khaled_garbaya
@khaled_garbaya Nice!

I'd also love to see tips on making architectural decisions. Perhaps...

- What to pre-render, how and when.
- How/if to augment pre-rendered, with rendering-on-demand.
- Choosing a framework to suit your (users') needs
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 31st 2019 replying to this from @TatianaTMac
@TatianaTMac @SwissWebMiss @karenmcgrane @sallylait @RenderConf @SaraSoueidan @FronteersConf @charis @hj_chen @webconf_asia @sonniesedge @frontendunited @Una @smashingconf @NikkitaFTW @MinaMarkham @perfmattersconf @BettieRub @csscamp @jscamp @davidpich @Netlify Thanks! That’s very kind.
Excited to cross paths IRL soon at @nejsconf!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 31st 2019 replying to this from @karenmcgrane
@karenmcgrane I’ve really enjoyed watching

@sallylait MC @RenderConf
@SaraSoueidan MC @FronteersConf
@charis and @hj_chen MC @webconf_asia
@sonniesedge MC @frontendunited
@una MC @smashingconf
@NikkitaFTW MC various

...but would also like to see better representation across the industry
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 22nd 2019
Having real-time previews of how the content will render in the site is great for raising the confidence for content authors.

Lovely to see this in @netlifyCMS and this excellent scaffold project from @andybelldesign. Try it out with a couple of clicks! https://twitter.com/piccalilli_/status/1142523346363584512
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 30th 2019 replying to this from @dev__adi
@dev__adi @NaveenS16 @chriscoyier It's both. The more you can pre-render, the better. Low friction, low cost, and automated deployments make pre-generating and deploying very frequently viable. But you are right about scale — for sites with millions of pages, this becomes challenging.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 26th 2019 replying to this from @isaach
@isaach @Netlify @github @getrender Keen to hear what you went for and what your experience was like.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 22nd 2019 replying to this from @swyx
@swyx @mjackson @chriscoyier Yes! Whether rendering in the client with JS because you're shipping an app which demands it, or if you can pre-generate all of your site in markup at build time like with a blog, or somewhere in between, the key to JAMstack is in avoiding the need for an active web server.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 2nd 2019 replying to this from @altryne
@altryne @yoavweiss With #JAMstack sites, you want to pre-render as much as possible. @Netlify Split Testing allows you to serve up different pre-rendered branches right from the CDN to avoid the performance tax you’d get doing A/B tests with JavaScript.

https://youtu.be/5VgpJJUOng4
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 2nd 2019 replying to this from @raymondcamden
@raymondcamden @Netlify 🎉
Names for things are hard. And the cognitive baggage that comes with the word "static" is a big part of why another term is useful.

I'm less worried about the word we use, and more excited by the potential in...

- JAMstack
- Static
- StaticFirst
- Pre-rendered
- ShortStack
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 1st 2019 replying to this from @rem
@rem I do it server side at build time.
Because anything I can do ahead of time, I do ahead of time.

It doesn't add markup for me as it is done by my SSG (@eleven_ty) during the build.

One less thing to have as a client-side js dependency and on the render path.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 22nd 2019 replying to this from @andypimlett
@andypimlett @upfrontconf That's a good question.
This is a very light build but a deliberately excessive example to prove a point. Meanwhile it's also an example of a prerendered site architecture which avoids any execution on the server at request time. So under heavy load this is more energy efficient.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 13th 2019 replying to this from @
@healves82 @tudor_prodan @smakosh @gatsbyjs @GraphQL @HasuraHQ @Netlify If only this were up to me!
Prepare for... HawkStack™

I think we should use whichever term makes it easiest to communicate what the architecture is. #JAMstack has been getting more broadly understood, but I've also heard:

- StaticFirst
- Pre-rendered
- ShortStack

& more!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 26th 2019 replying to this from @superpatell
@superpatell @sebastienlorber @Netlify @zeithq @cloudfront @Cloudflare I'd suggest not doing that.

One of the advantages of this pre-rendered or #JAMstack approach on @Netlify is that your site is served directly from our distributed CDN. It's designed for this scenario. By adding a CDN in front of the CDN, you'll add latency and complexity.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 11th 2018 replying to this from @ensina
@ensina @NetlifySupport @Netlify Hey Sina,

Keep in mind that this hosting is for JAMstack (or pre-rendered) sites. So there is no server running at request time in which to run a PostgresSQL DB.

You could perhaps use this via #serverless functions as part of a decoupled API architecture.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 6th 2018 replying to this from @AndyWhalePhoto
@AndyWhalePhoto @frontendyork @imconnorm @AndyCallaghan @Netlify Yep. I like to think about putting as much distance as possible between the users, and the complexity.

Serving assets directly from a CDN after pre-rendering everything can be huge in this regard. And adding small pieces of logic via serverless functions can fill any last gaps.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 13th 2018
Live coding an AR application on stage at #coldfront18! 🤩
3D rendering, composting and a game including pickles and cats!

What's not to love?!

Nerves of steel from @srdanrasic in this excellent session.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 10th 2018 replying to this from @codemzy
@codemzy @Netlify 👍 In those few places where pre-rendering at build time is not going to cut it, you might indeed use functions to server-render. This example explores using #expressJS that way:

https://github.com/DavidWells/netlify-functions-express
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 9th 2018 replying to this from @sankalped
@sankalped @Netlify It doesn't.
There is no webserver to perform server-side rendering at request-time. Instead think of @Netlify as a CDN to serve your pre-rendered sites. Includes are typically performed by the templating of a SSG at build time.

See https://www.staticgen.com/ for leading SSGs
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 25th 2018 replying to this from @smakosh
@smakosh @Netlify It looks like you're using @gatsbyjs for your site, and that it doesn't expose a form as HTML (which the Netlify build bots need in order to create a form API for you)

There is some good info on this in the docs: https://www.netlify.com/docs/form-handling/#javascript-rendered-forms

and an example:
https://github.com/imorente/gatsby-netlify-form-example
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 8th 2018 replying to this from @philhawksworth
A few people have asked me what I did to make this so fast.

The answer is: nothing.
I just didn't add anything to make it slow.

I kept it simple.
The pages are pre-rendered.
The CSS is inlined.
I didn't add unnecessary javascript.
The work was done before you got there.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 2nd 2018 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@mattferderer @growdigital @Netlify Also, even with cached DB requests, you still need to render views and serve things on demand. Granted, adding layers of caching can expedite requests, but you are really adding layers of logic that you have to manage yourself which essentially make things behave as if static. :)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 2nd 2018 replying to this from @growdigital
@growdigital @Netlify Agreed!
Pre-rendered sites, built on the JAMstack?
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • July 12th 2018 replying to this from @toddmorey
@toddmorey I like that I used it both sides back when I made this.

https://www.hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 22nd 2018 replying to this from @
@jrTera3yte @Netlify Standard unhelpful answer: It depends! (On what your site/app does)

More useful guidance: The more you can deliver pre-rendered in your HTML, the more performant and robust your site will be. You can then enhance with calls to the same API client-side too. Best of both! :)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 21st 2018
Ooh, my @render_conf presentation is featured on the home page of @benotist! Yay!

I'm getting excited at how @benotist is shaping up, and would certainly recommend signing up for the beta. It nicely bridges Lanyrd & Speakerdeck.

https://noti.st/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 11th 2018 replying to this from @connordav_is
@dav_is_dev @ChrisFerdinandi @vincpa @ianfeather True. Do those things. They help. The difference is that *if* your site depends on JavaScript to be functional, or to convey and render the content, then *if* that fails to load/parse, the user is left at sea.

Progressively enhancing from content in HTML can defend against this.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 8th 2018 replying to this from @jlengstorf
@jlengstorf @Netlify Ha! Never fear!

I'm a Gatsby duffer... will this page view be pre-rendered too, or only available when rendered vis js? I ask because Netlify will need to spot a valid form in the HTML generated in order to generate a corresponding form API to post to.

https://github.com/imorente/gatsby-netlify-form-example
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 25th 2018
RT @render_conf: 'Serving for the win - Deploys and hosting for the rest of us' – @philhawksworth explores the tools & techniques to make t…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 13th 2018
Video of my @render_conf talk is now online. Sadly a few videos in my slides didn't play well with the snazzy projector. Those missing videos are here:

📺 Deploy dashboard: https://youtu.be/kMJHDWzT3eE
📺 Preview builds: https://youtu.be/ETSYoRsjtps
📺 A/B tests: https://youtu.be/Wg67_KXMsS4 https://twitter.com/Netlify/status/984826327818698752
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 12th 2018 replying to this from @render_conf
@render_conf @Marcus_Noble_ BLAM! https://youtu.be/x2iE0eo68Ok
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 11th 2018 replying to this from @Marcus_Noble_
@Marcus_Noble_ The talks were recorded, but I'm not sure what the timeline is for posting them. When it happens, both @render_conf and myself are likely to shout about it.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 3rd 2018
Who's got two thumbs and really enjoyed speaking at @render_conf?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/whiteoctevents/40317737574/in/album-72157667111416898/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 24th 2018
Honoured to have been part of #renderconf this year. I leave feeling inspired and motivated.

Thanks to @render_conf and everyone involved. And to all who found me to ask questions. Keep 'em coming!

My slides are online at https://www.hawksworx.com/talks/render
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 24th 2018 replying to this from @Marcus_Noble_
@Marcus_Noble_ @render_conf @Una @JSOxford Thanks Marcus. I had a blast! So impressed by the mental stamina of @JSOxford to drive straight into a post conference hack!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 24th 2018 replying to this from @Sohil_is
@Sohil_is @render_conf @csswizardry @Una @girlie_mac @NadiehBremer @jawache @BenedekGagyi Great seeing you.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 24th 2018 replying to this from @Sohil_is
@Sohil_is @render_conf Well, if you need anyone to anxiously describe what happens in videos... you know who to call.

:)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 24th 2018 replying to this from @simonminter
@simonminter @render_conf @NadiehBremer Thanks Simon! I loved the event too. Taking loads away.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @sid_marinako
@sid_marinako @render_conf Thanks a lot!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @josnow
@josnow @render_conf Thanks Jo! Loved the day!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @MadeleineRuddle
@Madeleine_NS @render_conf Strong hashtagging.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @Sohil_is
@Sohil_is @render_conf Thanks Sohil!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @DavidDarnes
@DavidDarnes @render_conf
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018 replying to this from @benjaminbenben
@benjaminbenben @dubaussi @render_conf @sallylait Yowzer!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 23rd 2018
"Hi! I'm Ben, and I have a microphone."
– @benjaminbenben

Love those first words at @render_conf as Ben and @sallylait get things started.
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 20th 2018 replying to this from @now_maciej
@nowakowskipl @Netlify The route works via the link on your home page. Could this be a client-side SPA which does not have all of the routes pre-rendered as valid entry points? Do you get different behavior locally?

@Netlify can help with pre-rendering: https://www.netlify.com/docs/prerendering/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 14th 2018
Launch day should be a time for celebration, not a time for anxiety.

Looking forward to @render_conf where I'll be talking about ways to avoid sleepless nights as you get closer to launching your next big project.

https://2018.render-conf.com/
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 13th 2018 replying to this from @Jack_Franklin
@Jack_Franklin @render_conf *checking diary and planning*
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 13th 2018 replying to this from @Jack_Franklin
@Jack_Franklin @render_conf ooooh.
I'm a total react noob. Would this make me less so?
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 13th 2018 replying to this from @sallylait
@sallylait @render_conf \o/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 13th 2018
Excited to *finally* get to a @render_conf. I've heard nothing but good things! https://twitter.com/render_conf/status/963369925795598338
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 25th 2018 replying to this from @sallylait
@sallylait @render_conf Yay!!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 25th 2018 replying to this from @DavidDarnes
@DavidDarnes @render_conf Great! See you there.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 24th 2018
Excited enough to just get to attend, let alone be a speaker among this lineup. Roll on @render_conf !

https://2018.render-conf.com/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 17th 2018 replying to this from @felipeleusin
@whymclovin @Netlify If you mean rendering views on the server at request time, then no. We believe strongly in the power of the #JAMstack and removing that complexity.

Powerful automation and reduced friction for timely *pre-rendering at build time* (not req) time is where our power comes from.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 13th 2018 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@AndiSmith @GoHugoIO Solved. (thanks to a helpful hint from @brycekahle)

Now my multi-paragraph summaries are properly formatted. From this:

https://css-styled-summaries--hawksworx.netlify.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/

to this:

https://styled-summaries--hawksworx.netlify.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/

thanks to this:
Embedded image from social media
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 4th 2018 replying to this from @m5
@m5 @brianleroux Some more "application-y" sites lend themselves better to client-side rendering driven by user actions etc as you mention. But the more you can deliver "ready to render" html down the wire, the better the perf and the fewer points of failure to worry about.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 4th 2018 replying to this from @brianleroux
@brianleroux No problem. Except often we render on the b/e (or "generate HTML") in response to a request, when we could have done that at build time & de-risked all of our hosting infrastructure.

Not all cases of course, but do blogs really need a DB to reply to get requests? (For example)
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 16th 2017 replying to this from @eduardoboucas
@eduardoboucas Nice! This is the approach I took on one of my projects. A @gulp build running on @Netlify turns @contentful content into HTML and JSON APIs for client renders. Works beautifully.

https://www.hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/

@jekyllrb & @GoHugoIO both offer output formats which could give this.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 14th 2017 replying to this from @hjortureh
@hjortureh @Netlify @contentful Yep. I do exactly that.

https://www.hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/

This site uses a bespoke SSG which I made myself, but the principle is exactly as you described. A gulp build gets the data from Contentful. Then an SSG builds it. Triggered by webhooks.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 12th 2017
...and although you *can* render with JS in the browser, it's nice to pre-render all of your site at build time. SSGs FTW! #smashingconf
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 24th 2017 replying to this from @smashingmag
@smashingmag @rachelnabors @slsoftworks @zeithq Yep. An SSG can output all of your site & also the API that drives it. Progressive Enhancement all the way down! https://www.hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 26th 2017
#fronttrends - We have a change to the running order. @g33konaut and @misprintedtype have swapped places. Rendering Performance is next.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 5th 2017 replying to this from @borismus
@borismus @mathias True, but this approach avoids another js dependency for your render. Depends on priorities for your site I guess.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 9th 2017 replying to this from @eisaksen
@eisaksen I think that pre-rendering is more robust and de-risks things... but of course, your requirements may justify other techniques.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 9th 2017 replying to this from @philhawksworth
@eisaksen I like to pre-render (functional requirements permitting) as it drastically simplifies the hosting & helps performance & scaling
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 9th 2017 replying to this from @eisaksen
@eisaksen TBH, I was Pre-rendering. I much prefer that when possible. I used the term "Iso" since the same templates & data were used
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 6th 2017 replying to this from @autiomaa
@autiomaa @simonw I'm a big fan of Hugo. The approach I took also presents the same data as static files for client-side rendering as a PE
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 6th 2017
Some buzzword-mungous waffling from me about this post https://www.hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/ on @heavybit's @JAMstackRadio podcast https://www.heavybit.com/library/podcasts/jamstack-radio/ep-8-isomorphic-rendering-in-the-jamstack/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • February 3rd 2017 replying to this from @guypod
@guypod @bdougieYO Should have called it "Isomorphic Rendering and other ridiculous buzzwords"
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 11th 2016
FINALLY hearing talk of build time rendering at #ChromeDevSummit! Many great perf optimisations mentioned already, this was notably absent.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 11th 2016
Waving my hands around in front of arrows and boxes. Slides from my #jamstacksf meetup are up. (video coming soon) https://speakerdeck.com/philhawksworth/easy-isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jamstack
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 10th 2016 replying to this from @Froggie92
@Froggie92 @Netlify Video soon (I think) until then... slides: https://speakerdeck.com/philhawksworth/easy-isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jamstack
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 10th 2016
Thanks for listening tonight at #JAMStackSF. My slides on Isomorphic Rendering (phew!) are now online: https://speakerdeck.com/philhawksworth/easy-isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jamstack
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 11th 2016
A static site I put on @netlify feels dynamic because of confident, frictionless deploys. https://www.netlify.com/blog/2016/08/11/release-engineering http://hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 5th 2016 replying to this from @ultraperk
@ultraperk I use a build to get and stash content as an API in server & client. Take a peek If you are interested http://hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • August 1st 2016
Blogged: Notes on making https://comedyinthecrown.com with @contentful, @netlify & "Isomorphic Rendering" on a #JamStack http://hawksworx.com/blog/isomorphic-rendering-on-the-jam-stack/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 14th 2016
@SmashingConf Is it me or has @ebrunborg rendered God as one of the ghosts from pacman? Busted! #smashingconf
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 31st 2015 replying to this from @auchenberg
@auchenberg Yep. That first render if HTML... But we are starting to debate 2 different things. Beer in Amsterdam will help the conversation
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 30th 2015
RT @jaffathecake: I did a little video on the real-world effects of client rendering vs server rendering vs ServiceWorker rendering https:/…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 19th 2014
RT @googledevs: Check out the new episode of HTTP 203, where @aerotwist & @jaffathecake talk about rendering performance on the web: https:…
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 15th 2014
Seeing Boston Globe on a Newton reminds me of http://unobtrusify.com rendered in W3M text browser https://flickr.com/photos/psd/3169949641/ #smashingconf
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 18th 2014 replying to this from @boagworld
@boagworld @addyosmani Are there page rendering speed implications for using Polymer? Rendering blocked? #smashingconf
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 23rd 2014
Making @trello faster by @bobbygrace - Performance breakthroughs from progressive rendering & less UI thrashing. http://blog.fogcreek.com/we-spent-a-week-making-trello-boards-load-extremely-fast-heres-how-we-did-it/
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 28th 2013 replying to this from @_shawnhansen_
@geekles @jaffathecake Expect that browsers can render your html *while* it is being downloaded. Perceived performance gains abound. PE FTW!
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 11th 2013
@FronteersConf @angelinamagnum Does appending many templates to a document have any impact on the rendering time of the page?
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • September 19th 2013
I use markdown all over the place, so I almost hugged @benoitgrelard when he showed me Quicklook rendering it with https://github.com/toland/qlmarkdown
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 23rd 2013 replying to this from @joshaustin
@joshaustin Not you… I'm just critical of 80MB pages which take 2 mins to render. I feel it impacts users and the web. Would love to talk
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • January 30th 2013
Reducing ‘time to content’ with progressive enhancement and tiered rendering. Great Performance Design from AirBnb. http://nerds.airbnb.com/weve-launched-our-first-nodejs-app-to-product
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 31st 2012 replying to this from @rcasseus
@rcasseus @smashingmag Actually mobile devices & suffer the most from these sites. They have huge bandwidth and rendering engine overheads
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • May 15th 2012
Some good notes from @paul_irish from his browser rendering optimisation session with Facebook engineers - https://plus.google.com/113127438179392830442/posts/Kgk78sixgYp
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 17th 2011
Wow. The WebGL rendering of 3d buildings in the newly improved maps.google.com is amazing.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 13th 2011
I love the simple but effective use of CSS3 transitions and rendering to create the device illustrations on http://reederapp.com
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • March 13th 2011
Wonderful workshop from @seb_ly on canvas animation. Demo of rendering 1000 bunnies proves popular. What's not to love?! #creativejs #sxsw
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 7th 2010
The new PDF rendering in #chrome looks super fast. Brought to your browser via the seamless auto update with security fixes. Nice.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • October 26th 2010
Stocking up my karma bank by surrendering my seat to a pregnant woman after helping on old lady over the road & all the way to the station.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 1st 2010
Are you kidding?! Smokescreen: A Javascript library which renders Flash content. http://is.gd/cyrYW #AtwoodsLaw
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 22nd 2010
The way Internet Explorer, ignores mime-types stinks of Clippy: "...it looks like you're rendering a web page..." http://is.gd/bDjWy #RTFM
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • December 23rd 2009
Trying to find a way to dodge troubleshooting the way an HTML email renders in Lotus chuffing Notes. Folks, email should be plain text.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • June 24th 2009
I prefer emails to be plain text, but using MS Word for HTML rendering? Pffft! MS, please http://fixoutlook.org and support Web standards.
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • April 17th 2009
Excitedly setting up my lovely new MacBook while bracing myself to surrender my trusty old MacBookPro. Stickers and all. http://is.gd/5d0A
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter
A photo of Phil Hawksworth's face
Phil Hawksworth @philhawksworth • November 24th 2008 replying to this from @san1t1
@san1t1 I think that rendering video is a great use of Flash at the mo. Many things don't justify Flash though. Site nav, slideshows etc
  • Permalink
  • |
  • Twitter

The source code of this site is available on GitHub and is hosted and updated by Netlify automatically after each code commit

Other than where specified, the content on this site is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.

Subscribe to a feed of blog posts on this site.